CodeWithKriti

The recent Trump-Putin Alaska Summit was closely watched across the globe. While no formal agreement emerged, Trump’s statement — “There’s no deal until there’s a deal” — reflected a stance of cautious diplomacy. It reminded the world that in international politics, outcomes take time, and rushed promises often fall apart.

Despite the absence of a signed document, the meeting was described as “productive.” In diplomacy, productivity is not always measured in deals, but in the quality of discussions, negotiations, and the potential they create for future agreements. By that measure, the Alaska summit ticked two of the three boxes: structured dialogue and negotiation, even if it fell short of a formal agreement.

The most pressing unresolved issue remains the Ukraine-Russia war. The world longs for peace, yet that day feels distant. The war’s ripple effects are being felt far beyond Europe — from U.S. sanctions and tariffs that affect countries like India, to disrupted trade ties and strained diplomatic relations. Peace is not just about halting conflict; it is about restoring global stability.

Another critical aspect is Ukraine’s role in these negotiations. While the U.S. positions itself as the world’s peacemaker, the real solution must involve both Ukraine and Russia directly. Mediation can help, but ultimately, only the warring parties can decide to end the bloodshed.

In this light, the Alaska summit can be seen as more than just another diplomatic handshake. It represents the beginning of a potential peace process — one that will be challenging, complex, and prolonged. The world may not have witnessed a breakthrough, but it has perhaps witnessed the start of a long road toward it.